PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-8.89%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-8.13%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-13.11%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-12.58%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-73.23%
Negative net income growth while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-72.87%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-73.02%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.30%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.10%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
23.81%
Dividend growth of 23.81% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
12.02%
OCF growth under 50% of AMD's 480.30%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
10.55%
FCF growth under 50% of AMD's 959.38%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
46.89%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
42.24%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
21.89%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
88.82%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 276.72%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
100.89%
Below 50% of AMD's 202.98%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
61.14%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 162.06%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-36.54%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while AMD is at 102.07%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
47.24%
Below 50% of AMD's 109.92%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-55.69%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AMD is 113.30%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
44.34%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
6.56%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
5.71%
Below 50% of AMD's 159.33%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
516.71%
Dividend/share CAGR of 516.71% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
193.79%
Dividend/share CAGR of 193.79% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
82.37%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 82.37% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-18.91%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
2.57%
We show growth while AMD is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
4.21%
Positive asset growth while AMD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-5.64%
We have a declining book value while AMD shows 23.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
13.79%
We have some new debt while AMD reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
2.93%
R&D growth of 2.93% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
-0.73%
We cut SG&A while AMD invests at 1.52%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.