PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.04%
Revenue growth under 50% of AMD's 22.91%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
0.29%
Gross profit growth under 50% of AMD's 32.08%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
0.32%
EBIT growth below 50% of AMD's 44.05%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
-0.96%
Negative operating income growth while AMD is at 6100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
297.09%
Net income growth above 1.5x AMD's 32.79%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
294.29%
EPS growth above 1.5x AMD's 33.33%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
297.06%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x AMD's 33.33%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
-0.20%
Share reduction while AMD is at 4.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.20%
Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 0.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.20%
Dividend growth of 0.20% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-42.35%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-45.64%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
56.33%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
47.90%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 11.98%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
27.80%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AMD's 22.71%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
134.19%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
247.85%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 58.96%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
94.00%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 61.85%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
178.55%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 113.32% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
324.95%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 141.04%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
121.24%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to AMD's 134.53%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
45.75%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
9.43%
Below 50% of AMD's 27.45%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
9.04%
Below 50% of AMD's 3127.63%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
520.16%
Dividend/share CAGR of 520.16% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
196.58%
Dividend/share CAGR of 196.58% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
82.35%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 82.35% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
13.77%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. AMD's 84.50%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
3.83%
We show growth while AMD is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-0.77%
Negative asset growth while AMD invests at 6.30%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
3.16%
Under 50% of AMD's 11.53%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
0.02%
We have some new debt while AMD reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
-0.26%
Our R&D shrinks while AMD invests at 7.19%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
5.87%
SG&A growth of 5.87% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.