PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.07%
Positive revenue growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
7.06%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x AMD's 1.38%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
12.90%
Positive EBIT growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
13.14%
Positive operating income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
11.74%
Positive net income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
12.59%
Positive EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
12.86%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.82%
Share reduction while AMD is at 8.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.80%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
0.16%
Dividend growth of 0.16% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
15.33%
OCF growth under 50% of AMD's 311.11%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
10.08%
FCF growth under 50% of AMD's 170.45%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
69.30%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
48.57%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
30.76%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 7.91%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
169.40%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AMD's 123.59%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
106.95%
Below 50% of AMD's 219.33%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
57.28%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 211.53%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
275.27%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 140.84% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
182.32%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 50.00%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
107.02%
3Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of AMD's 135.86%. Bill Ackman might push for an operational plan to match or beat the competitor’s short-term growth.
40.20%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
7.63%
Below 50% of AMD's 82.98%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
10.99%
Below 50% of AMD's 331.91%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
518.41%
Dividend/share CAGR of 518.41% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
121.07%
Dividend/share CAGR of 121.07% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
82.03%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 82.03% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
2.19%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. AMD's 7.96%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
1.24%
We show growth while AMD is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
0.25%
Asset growth well under 50% of AMD's 5.95%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-0.29%
We have a declining book value while AMD shows 18.31%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
0.02%
We have some new debt while AMD reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
1.56%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. AMD's 1.68%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
-10.20%
We cut SG&A while AMD invests at 4.23%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.