PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-11.16%
Negative revenue growth while AMD stands at 18.10%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-14.27%
Negative gross profit growth while AMD is at 22.14%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-19.78%
Negative EBIT growth while AMD is at 48.67%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-21.40%
Negative operating income growth while AMD is at 87.10%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-24.91%
Negative net income growth while AMD stands at 41.67%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-25.00%
Negative EPS growth while AMD is at 36.36%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-24.83%
Negative diluted EPS growth while AMD is at 36.36%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.21%
Share reduction while AMD is at 8.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.21%
Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 6.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
16.89%
Dividend growth of 16.89% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-11.95%
Negative OCF growth while AMD is at 88.89%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-13.67%
Negative FCF growth while AMD is at 123.46%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
48.40%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
14.96%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AMD's 10.65%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
4.75%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 46.53%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
133.26%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
54.69%
Below 50% of AMD's 145.59%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
35.00%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 79.13%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
117.46%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
45.49%
Below 50% of AMD's 130.10%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
9.10%
Below 50% of AMD's 353.98%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
21.96%
Below 50% of AMD's 159.55%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
-3.83%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while AMD is at 874.37%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-9.21%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while AMD is at 417.78%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
651.36%
Dividend/share CAGR of 651.36% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
165.01%
Dividend/share CAGR of 165.01% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
79.91%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 79.91% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-19.97%
Firm’s AR is declining while AMD shows 33.45%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-1.91%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
0.14%
Asset growth well under 50% of AMD's 14.75%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-0.66%
We have a declining book value while AMD shows 19.93%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-0.20%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
1.85%
We increase R&D while AMD cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
3.26%
SG&A declining or stable vs. AMD's 11.35%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.