PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.70%
Negative revenue growth while AMD stands at 8.17%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-0.29%
Negative gross profit growth while AMD is at 3.67%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
4.57%
Positive EBIT growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
-1.29%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
17.55%
Positive net income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
19.84%
Positive EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
19.35%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-1.61%
Share reduction while AMD is at 0.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.70%
Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 0.25%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-0.54%
Dividend reduction while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
102.12%
OCF growth under 50% of AMD's 473.85%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
130.43%
FCF growth 50-75% of AMD's 226.67%. Martin Whitman would see if structural disadvantages exist in generating free cash.
22.18%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
13.14%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 32.53%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-4.83%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AMD stands at 31.75%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
303.61%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AMD's 246.02%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
136.80%
Below 50% of AMD's 370.73%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
103.54%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 332.60%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
136.66%
Below 50% of AMD's 315.01%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
123.84%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of AMD's 156.05%. Bill Ackman would advocate improvements to match competitor’s profit expansion.
41.81%
Below 50% of AMD's 393.40%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
3.34%
Below 50% of AMD's 158.81%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
-15.44%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while AMD is at 1614.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-22.54%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while AMD is at 522.08%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
638.34%
Dividend/share CAGR of 638.34% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
162.46%
Dividend/share CAGR of 162.46% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
79.33%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 79.33% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-10.64%
Firm’s AR is declining while AMD shows 5.80%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
6.64%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. AMD's 25.38%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
0.94%
Asset growth well under 50% of AMD's 12.26%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
0.45%
Under 50% of AMD's 7.97%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
3.76%
Debt shrinking faster vs. AMD's 27.90%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
0.53%
R&D dropping or stable vs. AMD's 4.07%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
-3.84%
We cut SG&A while AMD invests at 8.04%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.