PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.23%
Revenue growth at 75-90% of AMD's 6.20%. Bill Ackman would push for innovation or market expansion to catch up.
5.71%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of AMD's 9.37%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
0.51%
EBIT growth below 50% of AMD's 17.30%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
6.95%
Operating income growth under 50% of AMD's 16.14%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
3.85%
Positive net income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
3.83%
Positive EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
3.89%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.33%
Share count expansion well above AMD's 0.43%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.32%
Diluted share count expanding well above AMD's 0.41%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-0.01%
Dividend reduction while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-12.94%
Negative OCF growth while AMD is at 62.09%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-19.39%
Negative FCF growth while AMD is at 73.33%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
60.04%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 24.68%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
55.67%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 161.39%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
20.69%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 71.72%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
353.80%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of AMD's 412.05%. Bill Ackman would demand strategic changes to close the gap in long-term cash generation.
269.23%
Below 50% of AMD's 1449.72%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
77.37%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 957.22%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
233.16%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
169.17%
Below 50% of AMD's 421.43%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
36.82%
Below 50% of AMD's 462.50%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
21.69%
Below 50% of AMD's 142.69%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
13.46%
Below 50% of AMD's 912.88%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
1.85%
Below 50% of AMD's 643.67%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
677.64%
Dividend/share CAGR of 677.64% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
167.94%
Dividend/share CAGR of 167.94% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
64.02%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 64.02% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
12.02%
AR growth well above AMD's 5.25%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-3.32%
Inventory is declining while AMD stands at 18.16%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
1.49%
Asset growth well under 50% of AMD's 12.11%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
10.30%
Similar to AMD's 10.49%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
-12.21%
We’re deleveraging while AMD stands at 3.77%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-0.52%
Our R&D shrinks while AMD invests at 6.46%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
6.78%
SG&A growth well above AMD's 3.57%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.