PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.78%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of AMD's 11.76%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
10.01%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of AMD's 15.31%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
15.16%
EBIT growth 50-75% of AMD's 27.65%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
14.13%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of AMD's 25.53%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
10.15%
Net income growth under 50% of AMD's 27.93%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
10.00%
EPS growth under 50% of AMD's 26.09%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
9.63%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of AMD's 28.89%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.11%
Slight or no buybacks while AMD is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.21%
Diluted share count expanding well above AMD's 0.08%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
0.10%
Dividend growth of 0.10% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
14.65%
OCF growth above 1.5x AMD's 6.01%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
12.52%
FCF growth above 1.5x AMD's 6.73%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
65.88%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AMD's 44.67%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
52.11%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 164.13%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
20.69%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 87.64%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
320.99%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AMD's 223.59%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
115.68%
Below 50% of AMD's 889.13%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
22.95%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 1910.57%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
259.89%
Below 50% of AMD's 588.39%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
156.30%
Below 50% of AMD's 625.00%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
45.48%
Below 50% of AMD's 423.83%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
28.12%
Below 50% of AMD's 154.63%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
21.70%
Below 50% of AMD's 1305.29%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
11.02%
Below 50% of AMD's 587.88%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
686.53%
Dividend/share CAGR of 686.53% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
168.06%
Dividend/share CAGR of 168.06% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
64.54%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 64.54% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
0.44%
Our AR growth while AMD is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-1.80%
Inventory is declining while AMD stands at 6.78%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
4.91%
Asset growth at 75-90% of AMD's 6.41%. Bill Ackman suggests reviewing opportunities to match or surpass the competitor's asset expansion if profitable.
9.59%
Similar to AMD's 9.90%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
0.02%
Debt shrinking faster vs. AMD's 0.36%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
1.30%
R&D dropping or stable vs. AMD's 8.03%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.