PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.07%
Revenue growth under 50% of AMD's 11.89%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
6.28%
Gross profit growth under 50% of AMD's 16.30%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
8.28%
EBIT growth below 50% of AMD's 19.90%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
8.59%
Operating income growth under 50% of AMD's 22.80%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
9.81%
Net income growth above 1.5x AMD's 5.53%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
9.48%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x AMD's 6.58%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if strategic initiatives like cost cutting or better capital management explain the difference.
9.66%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x AMD's 6.67%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic moves (e.g., targeted acquisitions, cost cuts) explain the edge.
0.11%
Slight or no buybacks while AMD is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.62%
Dividend growth of 12.62% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-2.92%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-44.64%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
73.70%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to AMD's 70.02%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
52.56%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 221.10%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
34.08%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 176.97%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
198.43%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AMD's 161.87%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
83.17%
Below 50% of AMD's 221.76%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
13.33%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 856.31%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
782.06%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 427.83% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
120.11%
Below 50% of AMD's 1505.41%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
77.97%
Below 50% of AMD's 1987.36%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
49.67%
Below 50% of AMD's 180.90%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
37.23%
Below 50% of AMD's 1226.20%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
52.90%
Below 50% of AMD's 382.25%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
576.51%
Dividend/share CAGR of 576.51% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
129.41%
Dividend/share CAGR of 129.41% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
48.82%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 48.82% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
2.90%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. AMD's 21.49%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
2.52%
Inventory growth well above AMD's 2.79%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
6.03%
Asset growth at 50-75% of AMD's 11.35%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
9.61%
BV/share growth above 1.5x AMD's 5.08%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
6.03%
Debt shrinking faster vs. AMD's 13.57%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
0.26%
R&D dropping or stable vs. AMD's 6.01%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
-1.94%
We cut SG&A while AMD invests at 20.92%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.