PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.51%
Revenue growth under 50% of AMD's 21.99%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
2.75%
Gross profit growth under 50% of AMD's 23.83%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
2.63%
Positive EBIT growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
2.40%
Positive operating income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
2.95%
Positive net income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
3.03%
Positive EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
3.96%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.11%
Share reduction while AMD is at 14.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.21%
Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 15.38%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.20%
Dividend growth of 0.20% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-9.04%
Negative OCF growth while AMD is at 21.05%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
58.23%
FCF growth above 1.5x AMD's 25.54%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
94.62%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to AMD's 94.23%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
55.90%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 193.74%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
38.84%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 427.58%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
491.32%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AMD's 386.30%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
191.60%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of AMD's 295.60%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
97.03%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 632.51%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
928.53%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 169.67% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
138.70%
Below 50% of AMD's 1500.00%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
83.99%
Below 50% of AMD's 5500.00%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
56.79%
Below 50% of AMD's 2650.62%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
42.46%
Below 50% of AMD's 7852.07%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
67.39%
Below 50% of AMD's 3427.79%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
575.06%
Dividend/share CAGR of 575.06% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
129.88%
Dividend/share CAGR of 129.88% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
49.37%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 49.37% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
5.53%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. AMD's 35.93%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
7.85%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. AMD's 24.35%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
2.43%
Asset growth well under 50% of AMD's 438.81%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
5.24%
Under 50% of AMD's 547.01%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-5.65%
We’re deleveraging while AMD stands at 226.32%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
0.51%
R&D dropping or stable vs. AMD's 30.70%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
4.46%
SG&A declining or stable vs. AMD's 34.16%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.