PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.56%
Positive revenue growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-0.22%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-0.70%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-1.65%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
0.17%
Positive net income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
1.21%
Positive EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
0.82%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.76%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.75%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-0.09%
Dividend reduction while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
56.45%
Positive OCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
68.74%
Positive FCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
91.35%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of AMD's 102.30%. Bill Ackman would press for new markets or product lines to narrow the gap.
37.79%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 121.16%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
42.33%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 109.89%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
184.81%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of AMD's 285.48%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
73.82%
Below 50% of AMD's 820.43%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
42.20%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 180.12%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
262.30%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 119.39% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
93.27%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
64.93%
Positive short-term CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
57.46%
Below 50% of AMD's 2444.01%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
42.87%
Below 50% of AMD's 6502.89%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
65.35%
Below 50% of AMD's 1602.58%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
570.52%
Dividend/share CAGR of 570.52% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
129.76%
Dividend/share CAGR of 129.76% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
49.28%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 49.28% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-6.85%
Firm’s AR is declining while AMD shows 7.08%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
9.32%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. AMD's 27.23%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
5.40%
Asset growth above 1.5x AMD's 0.46%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
3.73%
BV/share growth above 1.5x AMD's 1.35%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
9.57%
We have some new debt while AMD reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
4.11%
We increase R&D while AMD cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
2.13%
We expand SG&A while AMD cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.