PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-10.89%
Negative revenue growth while AMD stands at 0.61%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-14.65%
Negative gross profit growth while AMD is at 20.90%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-17.85%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-18.75%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-14.51%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-13.94%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-13.77%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.77%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.76%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
7.68%
Dividend growth of 7.68% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-26.17%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-45.60%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
92.58%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of AMD's 123.01%. Bill Ackman would press for new markets or product lines to narrow the gap.
35.39%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 149.98%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
43.56%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 93.93%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
131.20%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of AMD's 191.20%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
15.09%
Positive OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
19.89%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
812.98%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 102.04% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
520.08%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
88.83%
Positive short-term CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
63.37%
Below 50% of AMD's 4581.63%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
53.31%
Below 50% of AMD's 5260.91%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
68.54%
Below 50% of AMD's 1326.82%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
487.06%
Dividend/share CAGR of 487.06% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
99.82%
Dividend/share CAGR of 99.82% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
37.51%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 37.51% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-7.11%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
14.68%
Inventory growth well above AMD's 11.93%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
4.41%
Positive asset growth while AMD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.26%
BV/share growth above 1.5x AMD's 0.51%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
14.39%
We have some new debt while AMD reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
0.70%
R&D dropping or stable vs. AMD's 6.80%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
-0.46%
We cut SG&A while AMD invests at 5.92%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.