PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.47%
Revenue growth above 1.5x AMD's 0.11%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
1.64%
Positive gross profit growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
3.82%
EBIT growth below 50% of AMD's 125.49%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
1.96%
Operating income growth under 50% of AMD's 86.21%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
0.82%
Net income growth under 50% of AMD's 119.42%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
0.53%
EPS growth under 50% of AMD's 122.22%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
1.08%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of AMD's 122.22%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.11%
Share reduction more than 1.5x AMD's 4.38%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.11%
Dividend reduction while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
20.60%
Positive OCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-126.40%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
80.64%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of AMD's 111.89%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
21.37%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 98.34%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
41.12%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 107.17%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
152.14%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 597.08%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-17.56%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is at 647.36%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-17.95%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD stands at 16.49%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
216.94%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 116.75% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
31.88%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
25.88%
Positive short-term CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
74.95%
Below 50% of AMD's 6950.14%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
61.29%
Below 50% of AMD's 3976.54%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
110.37%
Below 50% of AMD's 1145.99%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
342.27%
Dividend/share CAGR of 342.27% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
99.75%
Dividend/share CAGR of 99.75% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
37.90%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 37.90% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
4.21%
AR growth well above AMD's 6.73%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
13.41%
Inventory growth well above AMD's 7.84%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
5.88%
Asset growth above 1.5x AMD's 0.49%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
4.46%
Positive BV/share change while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
10.79%
Debt growth far above AMD's 0.42%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
4.84%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. AMD's 2.27%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
-2.74%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.