PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.02%
Revenue growth under 50% of AMD's 8.23%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
-3.26%
Negative gross profit growth while AMD is at 11.37%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-3.40%
Negative EBIT growth while AMD is at 988.46%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-4.06%
Negative operating income growth while AMD is at 1220.00%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-0.75%
Negative net income growth while AMD stands at 1007.41%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-0.53%
Negative EPS growth while AMD is at 800.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-1.07%
Negative diluted EPS growth while AMD is at 800.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.09%
Dividend growth of 0.09% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
38.46%
OCF growth above 1.5x AMD's 11.08%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
1040.43%
FCF growth above 1.5x AMD's 16.93%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
68.63%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of AMD's 91.19%. Bill Ackman would press for new markets or product lines to narrow the gap.
13.51%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 139.39%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
19.91%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 51.07%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
103.13%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 865.50%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-1.85%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is at 202.36%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
35.56%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
227.96%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AMD's 200.00%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
16.17%
Below 50% of AMD's 100.00%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
27.56%
Positive short-term CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
81.65%
Below 50% of AMD's 5999.96%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
68.77%
Below 50% of AMD's 3233.74%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
101.75%
Below 50% of AMD's 937.09%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
341.28%
Dividend/share CAGR of 341.28% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
99.61%
Dividend/share CAGR of 99.61% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
37.84%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 37.84% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
1.02%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. AMD's 17.18%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
4.80%
We show growth while AMD is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
2.26%
Positive asset growth while AMD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
4.34%
Positive BV/share change while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
0.03%
Debt shrinking faster vs. AMD's 0.07%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
-1.26%
Our R&D shrinks while AMD invests at 4.44%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-1.95%
We cut SG&A while AMD invests at 5.30%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.