PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-10.20%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-13.82%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-14.40%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-16.11%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-19.40%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-19.33%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-19.46%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.22%
Share reduction more than 1.5x AMD's 8.73%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.22%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x AMD's 0.68%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-0.05%
Dividend reduction while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-47.14%
Negative OCF growth while AMD is at 36.75%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-129.77%
Negative FCF growth while AMD is at 56.61%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
45.79%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to AMD's 48.64%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
5.11%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 291.79%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-13.52%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AMD stands at 11.51%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
161.49%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of AMD's 196.90%. Bill Ackman would demand strategic changes to close the gap in long-term cash generation.
-5.20%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is at 322.73%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-44.30%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
169.54%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of AMD's 333.33%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
-6.31%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while AMD is 600.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-36.13%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
89.97%
Below 50% of AMD's 4072.55%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
105.71%
Below 50% of AMD's 2761.98%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
69.26%
Below 50% of AMD's 509.00%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
332.40%
Dividend/share CAGR of 332.40% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
68.60%
Dividend/share CAGR of 68.60% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
27.51%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 27.51% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-6.49%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
2.10%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. AMD's 6.92%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
7.84%
Asset growth above 1.5x AMD's 0.01%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
0.29%
Positive BV/share change while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
20.36%
We have some new debt while AMD reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
3.91%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. AMD's 0.93%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
3.88%
We expand SG&A while AMD cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.