PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.61%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of AMD's 16.86%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
11.90%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of AMD's 19.38%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
22.28%
EBIT growth below 50% of AMD's 134.57%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
24.52%
Operating income growth under 50% of AMD's 169.14%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
20.85%
Net income growth under 50% of AMD's 190.94%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
20.33%
EPS growth under 50% of AMD's 200.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
20.49%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of AMD's 193.75%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.11%
Slight or no buybacks while AMD is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.11%
Slight or no buyback while AMD is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
0.06%
Dividend growth of 0.06% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
10.25%
OCF growth above 1.5x AMD's 5.90%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
-17.95%
Negative FCF growth while AMD is at 12.98%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
37.66%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 150.38%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
12.73%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 156.39%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-9.62%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AMD stands at 20.11%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
45.40%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 1730.59%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-10.96%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is at 81.73%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-27.88%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
91.44%
Below 50% of AMD's 2279.63%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-2.12%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while AMD is 335.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-29.28%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
91.46%
Below 50% of AMD's 5488.70%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
96.82%
Below 50% of AMD's 1673.35%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
43.67%
Below 50% of AMD's 506.64%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
332.01%
Dividend/share CAGR of 332.01% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
68.60%
Dividend/share CAGR of 68.60% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
27.39%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 27.39% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
8.83%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. AMD's 25.93%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
4.63%
Inventory growth well above AMD's 7.67%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
0.78%
Asset growth well under 50% of AMD's 2.58%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
0.20%
Under 50% of AMD's 3.05%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
4.92%
We have some new debt while AMD reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
-1.20%
Our R&D shrinks while AMD invests at 3.35%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-7.96%
We cut SG&A while AMD invests at 10.92%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.