PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.55%
Positive revenue growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-0.04%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-5.71%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-3.85%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-2.16%
Negative net income growth while AMD stands at 47.10%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-2.27%
Negative EPS growth while AMD is at 46.67%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-1.54%
Negative diluted EPS growth while AMD is at 51.72%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.22%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.33%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
0.06%
Dividend growth of 0.06% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-57.51%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-134.00%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
48.25%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 246.36%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
25.05%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 207.08%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-15.86%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AMD stands at 9.47%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
60.00%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 360.33%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
2.07%
Below 50% of AMD's 1165.19%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-59.84%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
106.27%
Below 50% of AMD's 288.92%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
2.74%
Below 50% of AMD's 222.71%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-45.67%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
81.59%
Below 50% of AMD's 163202.77%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
117.02%
Below 50% of AMD's 1305.29%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
18.72%
Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
299.12%
Dividend/share CAGR of 299.12% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
50.60%
Dividend/share CAGR of 50.60% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
18.13%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 18.13% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
77.72%
Our AR growth while AMD is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
3.53%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. AMD's 11.89%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-4.93%
Negative asset growth while AMD invests at 3.36%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-2.73%
We have a declining book value while AMD shows 0.73%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-5.50%
We’re deleveraging while AMD stands at 113.88%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
5.30%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. AMD's 0.93%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
5.83%
SG&A declining or stable vs. AMD's 11.87%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.