PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.31%
Revenue growth above 1.5x AMD's 3.32%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
11.33%
Positive gross profit growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
14.74%
Positive EBIT growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
18.05%
Positive operating income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
9.84%
Net income growth under 50% of AMD's 22.99%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
10.85%
EPS growth under 50% of AMD's 22.73%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
10.16%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of AMD's 22.73%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.22%
Share reduction while AMD is at 0.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.44%
Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 0.25%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-0.02%
Dividend reduction while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
119.08%
Similar OCF growth to AMD's 114.16%. Walter Schloss would assume comparable operations or industry factors.
302.55%
FCF growth above 1.5x AMD's 137.83%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
56.74%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 291.07%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
38.54%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 187.73%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-13.53%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AMD stands at 16.97%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
158.33%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 1762.05%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
9.09%
Below 50% of AMD's 498.63%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
6.59%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 93.14%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
111.90%
Below 50% of AMD's 330.94%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-5.33%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while AMD is 301.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-42.73%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AMD is 94.48%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
83.06%
Below 50% of AMD's 20384.37%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
116.48%
Below 50% of AMD's 1205.86%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
17.94%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 7.82%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
297.32%
Dividend/share CAGR of 297.32% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
51.38%
Dividend/share CAGR of 51.38% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
18.05%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 18.05% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-36.69%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
2.67%
Inventory growth well above AMD's 4.07%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
3.48%
Asset growth at 75-90% of AMD's 4.57%. Bill Ackman suggests reviewing opportunities to match or surpass the competitor's asset expansion if profitable.
0.20%
Under 50% of AMD's 2.89%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
9.30%
We have some new debt while AMD reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
1.93%
R&D dropping or stable vs. AMD's 9.61%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
2.75%
SG&A declining or stable vs. AMD's 11.85%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.