205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.84%
Revenue growth above 1.5x AVGO's 0.59%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
7.84%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x AVGO's 0.51%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
7.84%
Positive EBIT growth while AVGO is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
7.84%
Positive operating income growth while AVGO is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-34.14%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-33.33%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-33.33%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.64%
Share count expansion well above AVGO's 0.26%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.64%
Slight or no buyback while AVGO is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
8.00%
Dividend growth above 1.5x AVGO's 0.14%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.81%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AVGO's 409.54%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
7.81%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AVGO's 122.61%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
7.81%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AVGO's 60.90%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
291.16%
Below 50% of AVGO's 691.11%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
291.16%
Below 50% of AVGO's 651.30%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
291.16%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AVGO's 66.58%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.00%
Below 50% of AVGO's 1441.93%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
8.00%
Below 50% of AVGO's 71.80%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
8.00%
Below 50% of AVGO's 38.29%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.