205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.65%
Revenue growth above 1.5x AVGO's 0.59%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
12.33%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x AVGO's 0.51%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
1050.00%
Positive EBIT growth while AVGO is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
1050.00%
Positive operating income growth while AVGO is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-15.38%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.01%
Share reduction more than 1.5x AVGO's 0.26%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.01%
Slight or no buyback while AVGO is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-0.01%
Dividend reduction while AVGO stands at 0.14%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
69.74%
OCF growth above 1.5x AVGO's 7.23%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
20.39%
FCF growth above 1.5x AVGO's 6.62%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
18.60%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AVGO's 409.54%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
18.60%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AVGO's 122.61%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
10.01%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AVGO's 60.90%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.11%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while AVGO is at 691.11%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-17.11%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while AVGO is 651.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-78.81%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AVGO is 66.58%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
76.59%
Below 50% of AVGO's 1441.93%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
76.59%
Similar 5Y dividend/share CAGR to AVGO's 71.80%. Walter Schloss sees parallel philosophies in mid-term capital returns.
63.51%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x AVGO's 38.29%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
6.33%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. AVGO's 14.59%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
3.96%
Inventory growth well above AVGO's 5.71%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
2.15%
Positive asset growth while AVGO is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-0.58%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
4.84%
Debt growth far above AVGO's 1.06%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.10%
SG&A declining or stable vs. AVGO's 14.12%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.