205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.37%
Negative revenue growth while AVGO stands at 0.59%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-66.16%
Negative gross profit growth while AVGO is at 0.51%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
12.50%
Positive EBIT growth while AVGO is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
12.50%
Positive operating income growth while AVGO is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
3.57%
Positive net income growth while AVGO is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
-9.17%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-9.17%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-3.70%
Share reduction while AVGO is at 0.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-3.70%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
12.88%
Dividend growth above 1.5x AVGO's 0.14%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
-90.30%
Negative OCF growth while AVGO is at 7.23%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-135.76%
Negative FCF growth while AVGO is at 6.62%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
38.03%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AVGO's 409.54%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
38.03%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AVGO's 122.61%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
12.06%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AVGO's 60.90%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-298.66%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while AVGO is at 691.11%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-298.66%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while AVGO is 651.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-163.05%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AVGO is 66.58%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
76.37%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x AVGO's 38.29%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
-5.93%
Firm’s AR is declining while AVGO shows 14.59%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
2.82%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. AVGO's 5.71%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
0.20%
Positive asset growth while AVGO is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
0.63%
Positive BV/share change while AVGO is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
18.67%
Debt growth far above AVGO's 1.06%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.20%
We cut SG&A while AVGO invests at 14.12%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.