205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.37%
Revenue growth above 1.5x AVGO's 0.59%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
-7.67%
Negative gross profit growth while AVGO is at 0.51%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-217.14%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-217.14%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-190.74%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-160.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-160.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.49%
Share reduction while AVGO is at 0.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.49%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
402.45%
Dividend growth above 1.5x AVGO's 0.14%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
-59.18%
Negative OCF growth while AVGO is at 7.23%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
0.93%
FCF growth under 50% of AVGO's 6.62%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
30.70%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AVGO's 409.54%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
30.70%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AVGO's 122.61%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
8.56%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AVGO's 60.90%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1331.05%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while AVGO is at 691.11%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-1331.05%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while AVGO is 651.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-271.58%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AVGO is 66.58%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
857.05%
10Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of AVGO's 1441.93%. Martin Whitman suspects the firm lags in returning cash to shareholders over the decade.
857.05%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x AVGO's 71.80%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
786.16%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x AVGO's 38.29%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
6.53%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. AVGO's 14.59%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-4.17%
Inventory is declining while AVGO stands at 5.71%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-1.07%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-13.85%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
19.44%
Debt growth far above AVGO's 1.06%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.77%
SG&A growth well above AVGO's 14.12%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.