205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.66%
Revenue growth above 1.5x AVGO's 0.59%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
11.13%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x AVGO's 0.51%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
26.01%
Positive EBIT growth while AVGO is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
26.01%
Positive operating income growth while AVGO is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
30.36%
Positive net income growth while AVGO is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
25.00%
Positive EPS growth while AVGO is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
25.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AVGO is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
8.46%
Share count expansion well above AVGO's 0.26%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
8.46%
Slight or no buyback while AVGO is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-11.64%
Dividend reduction while AVGO stands at 0.14%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
10.43%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x AVGO's 7.23%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
36.00%
FCF growth above 1.5x AVGO's 6.62%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
54.72%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AVGO's 409.54%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
23.99%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AVGO's 122.61%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
19.32%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AVGO's 60.90%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1572.62%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AVGO's 34.25%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
250.38%
Below 50% of AVGO's 691.11%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
41.03%
Below 50% of AVGO's 651.30%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
2034.79%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AVGO's 66.58%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.72%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while AVGO is at 188.08%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
45.00%
5Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of AVGO's 71.80%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging policy in mid-term shareholder returns.
-7.24%
Negative near-term dividend growth while AVGO invests at 38.29%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
13.12%
AR growth well above AVGO's 14.59%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
13.04%
Inventory growth well above AVGO's 5.71%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
5.91%
Positive asset growth while AVGO is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-1.03%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
0.44%
Debt shrinking faster vs. AVGO's 1.06%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.27%
SG&A declining or stable vs. AVGO's 14.12%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.