205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.78%
Revenue growth above 1.5x AVGO's 0.59%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
1.19%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x AVGO's 0.51%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
8.44%
Positive EBIT growth while AVGO is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
8.44%
Positive operating income growth while AVGO is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
3.96%
Positive net income growth while AVGO is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
5.56%
Positive EPS growth while AVGO is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
5.56%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AVGO is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.59%
Share count expansion well above AVGO's 0.26%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.84%
Slight or no buyback while AVGO is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
38.32%
Dividend growth above 1.5x AVGO's 0.14%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
30.10%
OCF growth above 1.5x AVGO's 7.23%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
26.88%
FCF growth above 1.5x AVGO's 6.62%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
129.53%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AVGO's 409.54%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
77.01%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of AVGO's 122.61%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
44.21%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of AVGO's 60.90%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2867.62%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AVGO's 73.80%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
31.90%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to AVGO's 34.25%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
378.63%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of AVGO's 691.11%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
3684.73%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AVGO's 651.30%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
303.89%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AVGO's 66.58%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
37.08%
Below 50% of AVGO's 147.32%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
53.77%
Below 50% of AVGO's 188.08%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.80%
Below 50% of AVGO's 71.80%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
10.83%
Below 50% of AVGO's 38.29%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
13.60%
AR growth well above AVGO's 14.59%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
5.04%
Inventory growth well above AVGO's 5.71%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
8.58%
Positive asset growth while AVGO is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
7.55%
Positive BV/share change while AVGO is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
4.60%
Debt growth far above AVGO's 1.06%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
2.79%
R&D dropping or stable vs. AVGO's 19.53%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
-5.72%
We cut SG&A while AVGO invests at 14.12%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.