PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.73 | 5.46
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.31%
Revenue growth above 1.5x INTC's 1.52%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
11.33%
Positive gross profit growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
14.74%
EBIT growth below 50% of INTC's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
18.05%
Positive operating income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
9.84%
Positive net income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
10.85%
Positive EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
10.16%
Positive diluted EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.22%
Share reduction while INTC is at 0.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.44%
Reduced diluted shares while INTC is at 0.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-0.02%
Dividend reduction while INTC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
119.08%
OCF growth at 75-90% of INTC's 152.15%. Bill Ackman would demand better working capital management or cost discipline.
302.55%
FCF growth above 1.5x INTC's 65.68%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
56.74%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 6.15%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
38.54%
Positive 5Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-13.53%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
158.33%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
9.09%
Positive OCF/share growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
6.59%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 137.80%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
111.90%
Positive 10Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-5.33%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-42.73%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
83.06%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with INTC's 84.80%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
116.48%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 15.99%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
17.94%
Positive short-term equity growth while INTC is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
297.32%
Stable or rising dividend while INTC is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
51.38%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while INTC is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
18.05%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while INTC cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
-36.69%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
2.67%
We show growth while INTC is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
3.48%
Asset growth above 1.5x INTC's 0.14%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
0.20%
Positive BV/share change while INTC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
9.30%
Debt growth far above INTC's 1.21%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
1.93%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. INTC's 1.21%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
2.75%
We expand SG&A while INTC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.