205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.36%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of INTC's 14.25%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
8.36%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of INTC's 14.25%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
-371.30%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-371.30%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
37.50%
Net income growth of 37.50% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate into a larger gap.
25.00%
Positive EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
25.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
1.33%
Share change of 1.33% while INTC is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
1.33%
Diluted share change of 1.33% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.05%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 89.60%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
22.05%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 89.60%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
22.05%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 89.60%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
280.11%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 280.11% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
280.11%
Net income/share CAGR of 280.11% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
280.11%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 280.11% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
16.20%
Positive growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
16.20%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
16.20%
Positive short-term equity growth while INTC is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
-46.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while INTC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-46.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while INTC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-46.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while INTC invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.