205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.27%
Positive revenue growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
7.27%
Positive gross profit growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-368.46%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-368.46%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
1.71%
Net income growth of 1.71% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate into a larger gap.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.11%
Share change of 1.11% while INTC is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
1.11%
Diluted share change of 1.11% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
31.19%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 121.87%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
31.19%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 121.87%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
31.19%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 121.87%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
317.31%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 317.31% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
317.31%
Net income/share CAGR of 317.31% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
317.31%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 317.31% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
13.09%
Below 50% of INTC's 41.93%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
13.09%
Below 50% of INTC's 41.93%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
13.09%
Below 50% of INTC's 41.93%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
-46.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while INTC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-46.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while INTC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-46.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while INTC invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.