PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
20.82%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 16.01%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
177.57%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x INTC's 18.27%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
251.26%
EBIT growth above 1.5x INTC's 31.74%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
251.26%
Operating income growth above 1.5x INTC's 31.74%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
-44.77%
Negative net income growth while INTC stands at 70.42%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-60.00%
Negative EPS growth while INTC is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-60.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while INTC is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
19.85%
Share change of 19.85% while INTC is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
19.85%
Diluted share change of 19.85% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
58.73%
Dividend growth of 58.73% while INTC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
39.52%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 215.44%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
39.52%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 215.44%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
28.30%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 185.58%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
179.25%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 179.25% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
179.25%
Net income/share CAGR of 179.25% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
24.43%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 24.43% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
57.92%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 100.99%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
57.92%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 100.99%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
32.66%
Below 50% of INTC's 126.81%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
-14.28%
Cut dividends over 10 years while INTC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-14.28%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while INTC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-14.28%
Negative near-term dividend growth while INTC invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
4.15%
AR growth well above INTC's 2.54%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-9.16%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
2.64%
Asset growth well under 50% of INTC's 6.56%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-15.87%
We have a declining book value while INTC shows 5.70%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
2.31%
We have some new debt while INTC reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.37%
SG&A declining or stable vs. INTC's 13.96%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.