PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-17.37%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-66.29%
Negative gross profit growth while INTC is at 10.79%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-101.44%
Negative EBIT growth while INTC is at 20.81%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-101.44%
Negative operating income growth while INTC is at 20.81%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-63.79%
Negative net income growth while INTC stands at 17.20%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-65.00%
Negative EPS growth while INTC is at 50.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-65.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while INTC is at 50.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-2.12%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-2.12%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
3.02%
Dividend growth of 3.02% while INTC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-74.43%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-1004.76%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
24.33%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 271.03%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
24.33%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 271.03%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
13.75%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 167.28%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
192.70%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 192.70% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
192.70%
Net income/share CAGR of 192.70% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
-83.61%
Negative 3Y CAGR while INTC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
76.60%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 76.60% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-2.85%
Firm’s AR is declining while INTC shows 3.18%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
6.52%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 10.46%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-1.34%
Negative asset growth while INTC invests at 2.14%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
1.80%
Under 50% of INTC's 10.08%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-3.06%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.50%
SG&A growth well above INTC's 6.00%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.