PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.53%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 4.55%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
-4.88%
Negative gross profit growth while INTC is at 5.53%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-115.79%
Negative EBIT growth while INTC is at 6.95%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-115.79%
Negative operating income growth while INTC is at 6.95%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-163.64%
Negative net income growth while INTC stands at 0.70%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-220.00%
Negative EPS growth while INTC is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-220.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while INTC is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.25%
Share reduction more than 1.5x INTC's 0.70%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.25%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x INTC's 0.70%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-4.40%
Dividend reduction while INTC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-112.40%
Negative OCF growth while INTC is at 7.99%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-101.65%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
29.67%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 211.81%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
29.67%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 211.81%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
12.58%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 84.17%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
92.23%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 92.23% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
92.23%
Net income/share CAGR of 92.23% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
-111.86%
Negative 3Y CAGR while INTC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
56.31%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 56.31% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
19.82%
AR growth well above INTC's 12.00%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
0.34%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. INTC's 3.21%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
2.77%
Asset growth well under 50% of INTC's 10.38%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-1.22%
We have a declining book value while INTC shows 7.56%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
16.84%
Debt growth far above INTC's 7.23%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.94%
SG&A declining or stable vs. INTC's 4.11%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.