PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.37%
Negative revenue growth while INTC stands at 8.29%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-66.16%
Negative gross profit growth while INTC is at 13.83%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
12.50%
EBIT growth below 50% of INTC's 30.81%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
12.50%
Operating income growth under 50% of INTC's 30.81%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
3.57%
Net income growth under 50% of INTC's 20.44%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
-9.17%
Negative EPS growth while INTC is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-9.17%
Negative diluted EPS growth while INTC is at 50.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-3.70%
Share reduction while INTC is at 14.83%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-3.70%
Reduced diluted shares while INTC is at 14.83%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
12.88%
Dividend growth of 12.88% while INTC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-90.30%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-135.76%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
38.03%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 242.29%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
38.03%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 242.29%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
12.06%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 45.86%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-298.66%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while INTC is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-298.66%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while INTC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-163.05%
Negative 3Y CAGR while INTC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
76.37%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 76.37% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-5.93%
Firm’s AR is declining while INTC shows 0.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
2.82%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 1.04%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
0.20%
Asset growth well under 50% of INTC's 1.75%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
0.63%
Positive BV/share change while INTC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
18.67%
We have some new debt while INTC reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.20%
We cut SG&A while INTC invests at 2.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.