PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.31%
Negative revenue growth while INTC stands at 2.98%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-58.24%
Negative gross profit growth while INTC is at 5.55%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
250.00%
EBIT growth above 1.5x INTC's 7.41%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
250.00%
Operating income growth above 1.5x INTC's 7.41%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
147.06%
Positive net income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
148.23%
EPS growth of 148.23% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
148.23%
Diluted EPS growth of 148.23% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
-29.30%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-29.30%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
53.23%
Dividend growth of 53.23% while INTC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-97.71%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-130.90%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
85.05%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 302.17%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
69.30%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 189.71%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
41.60%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 63.88%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
484.92%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 484.92% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
-31.93%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while INTC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-36.89%
Negative 3Y CAGR while INTC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
158.20%
Dividend/share CAGR of 158.20% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
139.08%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 139.08% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
0.22%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. INTC's 4.71%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
1.84%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. INTC's 8.00%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-6.19%
Negative asset growth while INTC invests at 3.39%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
37.76%
BV/share growth above 1.5x INTC's 16.25%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-11.77%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.17%
We cut SG&A while INTC invests at 4.07%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.