205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.66%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of INTC's 5.17%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
11.13%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x INTC's 3.54%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
26.01%
EBIT growth above 1.5x INTC's 2.95%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
26.01%
Operating income growth above 1.5x INTC's 2.95%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
30.36%
Net income growth above 1.5x INTC's 2.80%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
25.00%
EPS growth of 25.00% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
25.00%
Diluted EPS growth of 25.00% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
8.46%
Share count expansion well above INTC's 0.23%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
8.46%
Diluted share count expanding well above INTC's 0.23%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-11.64%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
10.43%
OCF growth above 1.5x INTC's 0.81%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
36.00%
Positive FCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
54.72%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 461.48%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
23.99%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 129.89%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
19.32%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 80.07%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1572.62%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 69.68%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
250.38%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 250.38% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
41.03%
Net income/share CAGR of 41.03% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
2034.79%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 176.70%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.72%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while INTC is at 66.33%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
45.00%
Dividend/share CAGR of 45.00% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
-7.24%
Negative near-term dividend growth while INTC invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
13.12%
AR growth well above INTC's 11.89%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
13.04%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 18.26%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
5.91%
Asset growth at 50-75% of INTC's 10.58%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
-1.03%
We have a declining book value while INTC shows 9.27%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
0.44%
Debt shrinking faster vs. INTC's 28.02%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.27%
SG&A growth well above INTC's 3.37%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.