PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.86%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 6.66%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
0.99%
Gross profit growth under 50% of INTC's 5.92%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
3232.57%
Positive EBIT growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
3232.57%
Positive operating income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-8.90%
Negative net income growth while INTC stands at 1.66%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-2.50%
Negative EPS growth while INTC is at 11.11%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-10.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-18.38%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
16.37%
Slight or no buyback while INTC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-9.44%
Dividend reduction while INTC stands at 11.55%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
36.22%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 25.46%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
88.24%
FCF growth above 1.5x INTC's 17.80%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
106.37%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 536.44%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
57.31%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 186.86%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
53.45%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 101.53%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.10%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC stands at 206.13%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
440.05%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 440.05% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
56.48%
Net income/share CAGR of 56.48% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
370.04%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 219.87%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
70.39%
Below 50% of INTC's 346.97%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
50.67%
Below 50% of INTC's 214.92%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
11.63%
Below 50% of INTC's 84.28%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
-29.09%
Cut dividends over 10 years while INTC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
31.31%
Dividend/share CAGR of 31.31% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
-15.96%
Negative near-term dividend growth while INTC invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
3.13%
Our AR growth while INTC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-7.95%
Inventory is declining while INTC stands at 15.92%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-1.04%
Negative asset growth while INTC invests at 8.45%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
23.65%
1.25-1.5x INTC's 15.95%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
-1.95%
We’re deleveraging while INTC stands at 22.74%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.65%
SG&A growth well above INTC's 10.69%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.