PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.16%
Revenue growth under 50% of INTC's 11.34%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
7.64%
Positive gross profit growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-97.12%
Negative EBIT growth while INTC is at 7.92%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-97.12%
Negative operating income growth while INTC is at 7.92%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
0.75%
Net income growth under 50% of INTC's 3.85%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
-7.69%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.80%
Share count expansion well above INTC's 8.91%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-7.31%
Reduced diluted shares while INTC is at 8.91%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-21.13%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
19.36%
Positive OCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
62.50%
Positive FCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
77.23%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 647.83%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
35.62%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 204.73%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
28.40%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 118.48%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
627.81%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 200.27%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
954.25%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 954.25% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
40.07%
Net income/share CAGR of 40.07% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
314.28%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 190.82%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.17%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while INTC is at 97.22%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.56%
Dividend/share CAGR of 3.56% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
-41.28%
Negative near-term dividend growth while INTC invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
10.84%
AR growth well above INTC's 5.73%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
2.55%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. INTC's 18.02%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
7.36%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 5.13%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
-15.41%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
1.99%
We have some new debt while INTC reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.63%
We expand SG&A while INTC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.