205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.49%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of INTC's 4.14%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
6.95%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 5.08%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic sourcing or brand premium explains outperformance.
39.71%
EBIT growth above 1.5x INTC's 4.85%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
39.71%
Operating income growth above 1.5x INTC's 4.85%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
37.31%
Net income growth above 1.5x INTC's 3.73%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
33.33%
EPS growth above 1.5x INTC's 11.11%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
33.33%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x INTC's 11.11%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.82%
Slight or no buybacks while INTC is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.55%
Slight or no buyback while INTC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-0.81%
Dividend reduction while INTC stands at 1.14%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-29.54%
Negative OCF growth while INTC is at 23.85%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-82.21%
Negative FCF growth while INTC is at 114.29%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
65.84%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 622.88%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
35.07%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 163.21%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
26.89%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 82.48%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1140.12%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 44.71%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
1129.69%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 1129.69% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
52.11%
Below 50% of INTC's 357.67%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
199.89%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 128.83%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.43%
Below 50% of INTC's 67.16%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
10.94%
Dividend/share CAGR of 10.94% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
2.72%
Dividend/share CAGR of 2.72% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
-88.41%
Negative near-term dividend growth while INTC invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
7.11%
AR growth well above INTC's 3.72%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
4.86%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. INTC's 21.03%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
3.78%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 3.02%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
6.90%
BV/share growth above 1.5x INTC's 3.45%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-1.41%
We’re deleveraging while INTC stands at 1.94%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.17%
We cut SG&A while INTC invests at 5.52%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.