PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.55%
Revenue growth at 75-90% of INTC's 3.36%. Bill Ackman would push for innovation or market expansion to catch up.
1.98%
Positive gross profit growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-0.34%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-0.34%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
1.09%
Net income growth under 50% of INTC's 2.97%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
8.33%
EPS growth of 8.33% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
8.33%
Diluted EPS growth of 8.33% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
0.53%
Slight or no buybacks while INTC is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.43%
Slight or no buyback while INTC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
28.73%
Dividend growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 19.87%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if management’s capital return strategy is more aggressive yet sustainable.
36.43%
Positive OCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
170.27%
Positive FCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
75.71%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 627.63%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
25.80%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 162.30%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
21.91%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 133.39%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32045.29%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 44.64%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
282.66%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 282.66% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
115.17%
Below 50% of INTC's 546.85%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
232.45%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to INTC's 216.34%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.64%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while INTC is at 165.29%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
7.50%
Below 50% of INTC's 101.72%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.23%
Dividend/share CAGR of 32.23% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
-78.93%
Negative near-term dividend growth while INTC invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
0.83%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. INTC's 20.21%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-1.58%
Inventory is declining while INTC stands at 15.12%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
2.49%
Asset growth well under 50% of INTC's 8.03%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
6.43%
50-75% of INTC's 9.44%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
-6.04%
We’re deleveraging while INTC stands at 22.57%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.61%
We expand SG&A while INTC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.