PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.08%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of INTC's 12.75%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
4.16%
Positive gross profit growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
2800.34%
Positive EBIT growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
2800.34%
Positive operating income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
1.08%
Positive net income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
-15.38%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-15.38%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.25%
Share change of 0.25% while INTC is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
-0.83%
Reduced diluted shares while INTC is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
4.28%
Dividend growth of 4.28% while INTC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
8.56%
OCF growth under 50% of INTC's 130.61%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
11.00%
FCF growth under 50% of INTC's 840.00%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
87.72%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 704.14%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
34.54%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 154.92%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
46.44%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 159.28%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.37%
Below 50% of INTC's 138.74%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
13.89%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 171.02%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
473.10%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 473.10% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
370.76%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 114.26%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
303.98%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 90.87%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
73.62%
Below 50% of INTC's 416.44%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
9.94%
Below 50% of INTC's 156.95%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
43.36%
Below 50% of INTC's 103.09%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
-25.54%
Cut dividends over 10 years while INTC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-13.13%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while INTC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-11.62%
Negative near-term dividend growth while INTC invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-1.10%
Firm’s AR is declining while INTC shows 3.61%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
1.38%
We show growth while INTC is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
2.13%
Asset growth at 50-75% of INTC's 4.10%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
5.88%
BV/share growth above 1.5x INTC's 2.38%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-4.09%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.96%
SG&A declining or stable vs. INTC's 18.93%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.