205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.88%
Revenue growth under 50% of INTC's 10.19%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
27.53%
Gross profit growth under 50% of INTC's 61.66%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-95.92%
Negative EBIT growth while INTC is at 144.59%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-95.92%
Negative operating income growth while INTC is at 144.59%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
22.34%
Net income growth under 50% of INTC's 138.98%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
36.36%
EPS growth under 50% of INTC's 85.71%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
36.36%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of INTC's 160.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.19%
Share reduction more than 1.5x INTC's 0.46%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.28%
Diluted share count expanding well above INTC's 0.46%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-0.19%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-45.94%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-90.99%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
103.46%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 913.77%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
63.64%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 173.23%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
9.95%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 152.08%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
169.26%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 336.58%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
1795.38%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 154.50%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
1540.34%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 1540.34% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
1453.85%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 324.79%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
274.20%
3Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of INTC's 324.79%. Bill Ackman might push for an operational plan to match or beat the competitor’s short-term growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.10%
Below 50% of INTC's 150.90%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
11.87%
Below 50% of INTC's 87.79%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.83%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while INTC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-42.43%
Negative near-term dividend growth while INTC invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
15.40%
AR growth well above INTC's 18.30%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
7.03%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 13.26%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
6.18%
Asset growth at 75-90% of INTC's 7.92%. Bill Ackman suggests reviewing opportunities to match or surpass the competitor's asset expansion if profitable.
7.50%
Similar to INTC's 7.49%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
3.05%
Debt shrinking faster vs. INTC's 14.74%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.80%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.