PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.14%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 9.47%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
13.66%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x INTC's 7.24%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
17.15%
EBIT growth above 1.5x INTC's 4.66%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
17.15%
Operating income growth above 1.5x INTC's 4.66%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
20.87%
Positive net income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
20.00%
EPS growth of 20.00% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
20.00%
Diluted EPS growth of 20.00% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
0.82%
Share reduction more than 1.5x INTC's 1.83%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
1.33%
Diluted share count expanding well above INTC's 1.83%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-0.82%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
68.24%
OCF growth above 1.5x INTC's 5.54%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
830.00%
FCF growth above 1.5x INTC's 40.00%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
110.16%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 900.19%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
77.19%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 222.10%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
45.91%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 121.38%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
164.73%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 106.37%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
147.97%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 85.14%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
1724.99%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 1724.99% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
2101.73%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 312.44%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
224.85%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to INTC's 209.33%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25.90%
Below 50% of INTC's 169.69%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
53.12%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 70.26%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
47.43%
Dividend/share CAGR of 47.43% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
-16.51%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while INTC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-22.60%
Negative near-term dividend growth while INTC invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
16.65%
AR growth well above INTC's 23.25%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
7.20%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. INTC's 15.33%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
7.28%
Asset growth above 1.5x INTC's 3.78%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
7.82%
BV/share growth above 1.5x INTC's 4.67%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
0.24%
We have some new debt while INTC reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
0.94%
R&D dropping or stable vs. INTC's 7.48%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
17.41%
SG&A growth well above INTC's 15.50%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.