205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.78%
Revenue growth at 75-90% of INTC's 7.11%. Bill Ackman would push for innovation or market expansion to catch up.
1.19%
Gross profit growth under 50% of INTC's 3.54%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
8.44%
EBIT growth above 1.5x INTC's 4.75%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
8.44%
Operating income growth above 1.5x INTC's 4.75%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
3.96%
Net income growth at 50-75% of INTC's 5.92%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
5.56%
EPS growth at 50-75% of INTC's 7.69%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
5.56%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of INTC's 7.69%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
0.59%
Share count expansion well above INTC's 0.11%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.84%
Diluted share count expanding well above INTC's 0.11%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
38.32%
Dividend growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 31.85%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if management’s capital return strategy is more aggressive yet sustainable.
30.10%
Positive OCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
26.88%
Positive FCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
129.53%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 935.02%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
77.01%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 231.93%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
44.21%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 147.55%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2867.62%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 59.07%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
31.90%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 105.63%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
378.63%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 378.63% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
3684.73%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 336.35%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
303.89%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 227.26%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
37.08%
Below 50% of INTC's 161.23%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
53.77%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 85.49%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.80%
Dividend/share CAGR of 20.80% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
10.83%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 10.83% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
13.60%
AR growth well above INTC's 16.54%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
5.04%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. INTC's 38.18%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
8.58%
Asset growth at 75-90% of INTC's 9.88%. Bill Ackman suggests reviewing opportunities to match or surpass the competitor's asset expansion if profitable.
7.55%
BV/share growth above 1.5x INTC's 4.19%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
4.60%
Debt shrinking faster vs. INTC's 44.66%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
2.79%
R&D dropping or stable vs. INTC's 5.70%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
-5.72%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.