PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-25.76%
Negative revenue growth while INTC stands at 1.40%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-23.84%
Negative gross profit growth while INTC is at 1.46%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-64.30%
Negative EBIT growth while INTC is at 2.76%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-51.83%
Negative operating income growth while INTC is at 2.76%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-43.99%
Negative net income growth while INTC stands at 3.11%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-38.89%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-38.89%
Negative diluted EPS growth while INTC is at 8.33%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.06%
Slight or no buybacks while INTC is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
-0.20%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-3.09%
Dividend reduction while INTC stands at 2.27%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-113.53%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-8871.43%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
86.35%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 1211.54%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
35.01%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 283.17%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
36.76%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 131.06%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-222.14%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is at 686.32%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-166.68%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC stands at 200.19%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
1100.28%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 1100.28% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
350.91%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to INTC's 323.30%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
93.82%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 64.28%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
53.91%
Below 50% of INTC's 213.91%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
101.64%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to INTC's 103.63%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.40%
Dividend/share CAGR of 6.40% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
40.10%
3Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 58.21%. Martin Whitman might see a weaker short-term approach to distributing cash.
-1.06%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
1.41%
We show growth while INTC is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-1.01%
Negative asset growth while INTC invests at 4.08%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
3.26%
Under 50% of INTC's 8.68%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
37.42%
Debt growth far above INTC's 10.46%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-36.28%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.