PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-10.32%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-13.87%
Negative gross profit growth while INTC is at 11.16%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-72.60%
Negative EBIT growth while INTC is at 16.09%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-51.78%
Negative operating income growth while INTC is at 16.09%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-53.37%
Negative net income growth while INTC stands at 16.44%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-49.18%
Negative EPS growth while INTC is at 14.29%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-49.18%
Negative diluted EPS growth while INTC is at 15.38%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.03%
Share reduction more than 1.5x INTC's 0.91%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.23%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x INTC's 0.91%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
0.66%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while INTC cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
329.17%
OCF growth above 1.5x INTC's 41.14%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
25.90%
FCF growth under 50% of INTC's 94.56%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
53.79%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 1086.92%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
17.67%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 199.61%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-2.29%
Negative 3Y CAGR while INTC stands at 114.55%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
582.23%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 323.13%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
-38.49%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC stands at 218.98%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
392.80%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 392.80% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
140.03%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 266.34%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
-41.82%
Negative 3Y CAGR while INTC is 81.05%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
80.63%
Below 50% of INTC's 174.28%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
71.68%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 114.38%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
104.00%
Dividend/share CAGR of 104.00% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
-78.68%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while INTC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
15.10%
Below 50% of INTC's 56.87%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
-3.94%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
0.35%
We show growth while INTC is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
1.30%
Asset growth well under 50% of INTC's 5.93%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.11%
Under 50% of INTC's 6.65%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
14.36%
We have some new debt while INTC reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
-3.29%
Our R&D shrinks while INTC invests at 9.23%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
1.26%
SG&A growth well above INTC's 0.19%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.