Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)

Revenue growth under 50% of INTC's 11.27%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.

Negative gross profit growth while INTC is at 19.02%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.

Negative EBIT growth while INTC is at 27.19%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.

Negative operating income growth while INTC is at 27.19%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.

Negative net income growth while INTC stands at 26.03%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.

Negative EPS growth while INTC is at 18.75%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.

Negative diluted EPS growth while INTC is at 26.67%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.

Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.

Dividend growth under 50% of INTC's 24.66%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.

Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.

10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 1147.94%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.

5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 311.13%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.

3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 128.28%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC stands at 136.71%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.

Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while INTC is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.

Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while INTC is 517.70%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.

Negative 3Y CAGR while INTC is 123.24%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Below 50% of INTC's 227.07%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.

3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 112.18%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.

Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while INTC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.

Below 50% of INTC's 96.00%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.

Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.

Asset growth well under 50% of INTC's 9.18%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.

We have a declining book value while INTC shows 8.14%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.

Debt growth far above INTC's 73.59%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.

R&D growth drastically higher vs. INTC's 2.51%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.