PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-51.02%
Negative revenue growth while INTC stands at 25.24%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-46.54%
Negative gross profit growth while INTC is at 37.64%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-9.60%
Negative EBIT growth while INTC is at 45.61%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-55.20%
Negative operating income growth while INTC is at 45.61%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
80.95%
Net income growth above 1.5x INTC's 45.58%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
81.13%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 73.68%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if strategic initiatives like cost cutting or better capital management explain the difference.
81.13%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x INTC's 42.11%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.19%
Share reduction more than 1.5x INTC's 7.91%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.19%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x INTC's 7.91%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-3.21%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
316.99%
OCF growth above 1.5x INTC's 95.73%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
184.15%
FCF growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 138.59%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capex decisions or cost controls create a cash flow advantage.
-28.67%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while INTC stands at 1220.09%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-39.49%
Negative 5Y CAGR while INTC stands at 370.16%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-62.42%
Negative 3Y CAGR while INTC stands at 129.11%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
64.38%
Below 50% of INTC's 609.99%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
39.55%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 215.64%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-185.06%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while INTC is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
70.38%
Below 50% of INTC's 790.74%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-115.93%
Negative 3Y CAGR while INTC is 173.24%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
91.70%
Below 50% of INTC's 864.43%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
88.43%
Below 50% of INTC's 236.08%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
33.93%
Below 50% of INTC's 91.20%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
1.01%
Dividend/share CAGR of 1.01% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
19.89%
Dividend/share CAGR of 19.89% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
42.45%
3Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 62.83%. Martin Whitman might see a weaker short-term approach to distributing cash.
-17.25%
Firm’s AR is declining while INTC shows 6.74%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-29.91%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-2.06%
Negative asset growth while INTC invests at 12.64%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-0.62%
We have a declining book value while INTC shows 4.49%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
6.74%
Debt growth far above INTC's 0.54%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
-55.80%
Our R&D shrinks while INTC invests at 15.81%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-10.69%
We cut SG&A while INTC invests at 27.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.