PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
91.94%
Revenue growth above 1.5x INTC's 0.12%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
122.82%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x INTC's 2.30%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
188.14%
EBIT growth above 1.5x INTC's 2.17%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
188.14%
Operating income growth above 1.5x INTC's 2.17%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
560.71%
Net income growth above 1.5x INTC's 3.82%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
589.13%
Positive EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
589.13%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x INTC's 3.70%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.32%
Slight or no buybacks while INTC is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
3.74%
Slight or no buyback while INTC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-0.32%
Dividend reduction while INTC stands at 16.61%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-54.39%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-88.70%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
43.31%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 1309.53%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-15.35%
Negative 5Y CAGR while INTC stands at 386.53%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-11.62%
Negative 3Y CAGR while INTC stands at 161.64%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2204.86%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 694.33%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
-32.61%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC stands at 294.47%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
39.09%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 39.09% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
104.35%
Below 50% of INTC's 908.85%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-7.92%
Negative 3Y CAGR while INTC is 246.90%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.90%
Below 50% of INTC's 241.82%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
63.10%
Below 50% of INTC's 126.80%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
101.36%
Dividend/share CAGR of 101.36% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
-22.01%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while INTC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
80.04%
3Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 110.73%. Martin Whitman might see a weaker short-term approach to distributing cash.
-5.56%
Firm’s AR is declining while INTC shows 7.01%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-5.69%
Inventory is declining while INTC stands at 6.19%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-1.04%
Negative asset growth while INTC invests at 5.76%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
3.01%
Under 50% of INTC's 18.24%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.71%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. INTC's 11.73%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
8.55%
We expand SG&A while INTC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.