PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.88%
Negative revenue growth while INTC stands at 5.72%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-3.46%
Negative gross profit growth while INTC is at 7.46%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-155.87%
Negative EBIT growth while INTC is at 4.54%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-155.87%
Negative operating income growth while INTC is at 4.54%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-116.65%
Negative net income growth while INTC stands at 10.74%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-116.07%
Negative EPS growth while INTC is at 12.50%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-116.82%
Negative diluted EPS growth while INTC is at 9.09%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.87%
Share reduction more than 1.5x INTC's 9.11%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
-0.32%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
5.33%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while INTC cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
-13.35%
Negative OCF growth while INTC is at 44.79%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-23.08%
Negative FCF growth while INTC is at 52.38%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
27.65%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 731.95%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
12.23%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 195.64%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-17.00%
Negative 3Y CAGR while INTC stands at 96.16%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.67%
Below 50% of INTC's 277.78%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
4.59%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 199.25%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-398.64%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while INTC is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-439.94%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while INTC is 243.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-244.17%
Negative 3Y CAGR while INTC is 355.94%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
176.53%
Below 50% of INTC's 981.08%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
178.97%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 198.97%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
85.07%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 102.61%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
93.86%
Dividend/share CAGR of 93.86% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
30.11%
Dividend/share CAGR of 30.11% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
40.58%
Below 50% of INTC's 90.73%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
-3.45%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-2.11%
Inventory is declining while INTC stands at 12.61%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-10.15%
Negative asset growth while INTC invests at 6.17%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-7.23%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-16.54%
We’re deleveraging while INTC stands at 12.74%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
169.45%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. INTC's 3.24%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
16.62%
SG&A growth well above INTC's 21.01%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.