PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.68%
Negative revenue growth while INTC stands at 13.12%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
9.32%
Gross profit growth under 50% of INTC's 25.40%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
43.39%
EBIT growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 31.54%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic initiatives are driving this edge.
33.50%
Operating income growth similar to INTC's 31.54%. Walter Schloss would assume both share comparable operational structures.
15.24%
Net income growth under 50% of INTC's 32.39%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
20.00%
EPS growth at 50-75% of INTC's 29.17%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
20.00%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of INTC's 30.43%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
45.37%
Share count expansion well above INTC's 4.86%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
42.90%
Diluted share count expanding well above INTC's 0.37%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-33.23%
Dividend reduction while INTC stands at 27.79%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-24.69%
Negative OCF growth while INTC is at 24.83%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-19.83%
Negative FCF growth while INTC is at 38.61%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-33.03%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while INTC stands at 743.73%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-57.43%
Negative 5Y CAGR while INTC stands at 194.13%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-63.08%
Negative 3Y CAGR while INTC stands at 70.12%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.86%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is at 292.51%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-46.80%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC stands at 111.35%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
12.76%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 12.76% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
-27.94%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while INTC is 220.62%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-56.65%
Negative 3Y CAGR while INTC is 143.61%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
115.41%
Below 50% of INTC's 805.88%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
42.97%
Below 50% of INTC's 187.65%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
6.40%
Below 50% of INTC's 97.05%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
29.25%
Dividend/share CAGR of 29.25% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
-1.57%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while INTC stands at 188.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-33.25%
Negative near-term dividend growth while INTC invests at 107.76%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-2.35%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
8.42%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 0.25%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
6.96%
Similar asset growth to INTC's 7.09%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions or investment rates.
-25.51%
We have a declining book value while INTC shows 2.27%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-1.07%
We’re deleveraging while INTC stands at 11.10%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-3.44%
Our R&D shrinks while INTC invests at 9.24%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
5.47%
SG&A declining or stable vs. INTC's 21.15%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.