PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.31%
Positive revenue growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
3.64%
Positive gross profit growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
12.92%
Positive EBIT growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
10.33%
Positive operating income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
34.92%
Positive net income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
33.33%
Positive EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
33.33%
Positive diluted EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-29.56%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-27.87%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
41.96%
Dividend growth above 1.5x INTC's 5.84%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
-48.82%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-112.03%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
3.06%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 765.61%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-24.01%
Negative 5Y CAGR while INTC stands at 184.06%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-27.73%
Negative 3Y CAGR while INTC stands at 61.97%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-52.04%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is at 378.18%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
385.77%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 82.60%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
143.28%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 143.28% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
73.69%
Below 50% of INTC's 244.65%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
48.33%
Below 50% of INTC's 136.79%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
145.52%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 223.05%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
49.68%
Below 50% of INTC's 102.96%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
83.48%
Dividend/share CAGR of 83.48% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
77.18%
Below 50% of INTC's 239.40%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
-2.22%
Negative near-term dividend growth while INTC invests at 115.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
7.14%
Our AR growth while INTC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
3.72%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. INTC's 7.96%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-1.20%
Negative asset growth while INTC invests at 5.15%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
45.27%
BV/share growth above 1.5x INTC's 11.94%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-3.48%
We’re deleveraging while INTC stands at 2.32%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
10.68%
We increase R&D while INTC cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
-1.52%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.