PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
17.46%
Positive revenue growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
25.99%
Positive gross profit growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
51.31%
Positive EBIT growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
54.85%
Positive operating income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
29.41%
Positive net income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
31.25%
Positive EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
25.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.26%
Slight or no buybacks while INTC is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.57%
Slight or no buyback while INTC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
2.76%
Dividend growth under 50% of INTC's 49.89%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
42.40%
Positive OCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
260.00%
Positive FCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
18.29%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 577.04%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-12.42%
Negative 5Y CAGR while INTC stands at 157.22%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-5.56%
Negative 3Y CAGR while INTC stands at 56.66%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.54%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is at 102.26%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
77.15%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
150.39%
Below 50% of INTC's 1221.00%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
64.61%
Below 50% of INTC's 188.64%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
310.75%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 80.30%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
130.52%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 223.05%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
48.58%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 96.88%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
88.55%
Dividend/share CAGR of 88.55% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
83.56%
Below 50% of INTC's 402.95%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
-0.18%
Negative near-term dividend growth while INTC invests at 225.19%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
18.90%
Our AR growth while INTC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
7.49%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 3.22%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-0.61%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
0.37%
Under 50% of INTC's 3.45%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-2.08%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
17.36%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. INTC's 10.26%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
4.02%
SG&A growth well above INTC's 3.70%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.