PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.97%
Revenue growth at 75-90% of INTC's 3.84%. Bill Ackman would push for innovation or market expansion to catch up.
4.03%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x INTC's 0.26%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
16.31%
Positive EBIT growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
12.45%
Positive operating income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
207.84%
Net income growth above 1.5x INTC's 16.36%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
204.00%
EPS growth above 1.5x INTC's 17.50%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
200.00%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x INTC's 15.38%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
4.94%
Share count expansion well above INTC's 0.42%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
5.32%
Diluted share count expanding well above INTC's 0.16%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-7.43%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
59.20%
Positive OCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
136.40%
Positive FCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
36.04%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 626.87%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-23.23%
Negative 5Y CAGR while INTC stands at 125.66%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-0.63%
Negative 3Y CAGR while INTC stands at 35.73%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
277.93%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 761.92%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
42.76%
Below 50% of INTC's 317.66%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-5.23%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC stands at 60.97%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
8874.99%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 1458.37% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
307.63%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 277.84%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
365.54%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 85.87%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
292.02%
Below 50% of INTC's 880.22%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
211.37%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 263.46%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
153.92%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 105.06%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
7.92%
Dividend/share CAGR of 7.92% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
29.26%
Below 50% of INTC's 323.49%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
-7.85%
Negative near-term dividend growth while INTC invests at 137.72%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
9.79%
AR growth well above INTC's 17.81%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
8.75%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 4.55%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
11.76%
Asset growth above 1.5x INTC's 1.48%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
7.81%
BV/share growth above 1.5x INTC's 1.01%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-1.82%
We’re deleveraging while INTC stands at 1.13%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-0.25%
Our R&D shrinks while INTC invests at 2.10%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
3.09%
SG&A declining or stable vs. INTC's 8.81%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.